Eastern Washington University

(509) 359-2247
Login

Ally Accessibility Checker

Modified on: Fri, Aug 23 2024 4:10 PM

Improve the Usability and Accessibility of Your Content

Your class is full of diverse students with unique learning abilities. Providing them with more accessible original content means they can choose formats that work best for them: HTML for improved reading on mobile phones, Electronic Braille for the visually impaired, and Audio for learning on the go. Ally automatically scans your original content and performs a series of steps to make them more accessible: 

  • Generates alternative formats for students to download
  • Provides accessibility scores
  • Gives instructors feedback on how to improve your accessibility score

As an instructor, there is no action required for Ally to perform these tasks. Through the Ally integration, any documents within a Canvas course will automatically be processed. Typically, you should see your accessibility score within 15-90 seconds. This may take longer if your content is complex, or if you have a lot of course content and it is being assessed all at once. FYI, Ally is a tool that runs in the background of your course and Accessibility results are only viewable by instructors, TA's, and admins; they are not available to students.

Additional Resources:

Accessibility Checklist
Adoption Toolkit
Ally Basics
Ally Quick Start
Alternative Formats
In-Browser Preview


Alternative Formats

Ally creates alternative formats of your course files based on the original materials. These formats are made available to students alongside the original content in your course, so students can find everything in one convenient location.

Instructors do not need to do anything for the alternative formats to be created, this happens as part of the Ally process. To see the different formats available, select the Alternative Formats link next to the file name. Choose any of these options and then Download to get an example of what will be available to students. 




Accessibility Score Indicators

Ally measures the accessibility of each file attached to your course and shows you at-a-glance how it scores. Scores range from Low to Perfect. The higher the score, the fewer the issues.

  •  Low: File is not accessible and needs immediate attention.
  •  Medium: File is somewhat accessible and should be improved.
  •  High: File is mostly accessible but could be improved.
  •  Perfect: File is fully accessible. No improvement needed.

For files with Low to High scores, Ally shows you the issues and gives a step-by-step guide on how to fix them.

Find a file and select the Accessibility score. Follow the steps in front of you to go step-by-step. Select All issues to see every issue in the file and decide what issues to fix first.

Select All issues if you want to see how much each fix will improve the accessibility of the file.

 

Instructor Feedback

Ally provides you detailed feedback and support to help you become an accessibility pro. Learn about accessibility issues, why they matter, and how to fix them. Green is the goal! 

Select the Accessibility score to open the instructor feedback. Follow the steps in front of you to go step-by-step. Select All issues to see every issue in the file and decide what issues to fix first.

Select All issues if you want to see how much each fix will improve the accessibility of the file.


Course Accessibility Report

The course accessibility report acts as a complement to the existing accessibility indicators. It provides an accessibility summary and overview at the course level. The Accessibility Report option displays in the course menu.

The report shows instructors this useful information:

  • Accessibility score for the course
  • Distribution of course content by content type
  • List of all issues identified in the course

Instructors see their course content items that have issues. Instructors can then access the instructor feedback from the report to fix the issue.

The report helps instructors determine priority and gives options for order of fixing. For example, content with most severe issues first or start with content that's easiest to fix.